Jessieh is reading... (and you ask why?)
Yes. I am reading
Lolita.
My first comment: The review board of Vanity Fair must consist of several strangely sick individuals. There is
NO love in pedophilia. When a man engages in sexual activity with a twelve year old- it is pedophilia.
Why I am reading Lolita:
Several reasons:
A.) I enjoy reading controversial material, especially when I know I have a bias in the matter. It leaves me with questions and answers to find. It also gives me something to argue about.
B.) I intend to write a very very very informative paper about the book once I am finished and I plan to deconstruct some of the viewpoints clearly presented (
i.e. "Lolita is a love story.").
C.) It allows me to take a some-what political stand against sexual abuse, instead of only taking a personal stand against it.
Tid bits of Lolita (as of page 71):
- The pedophile-narrator named Humbert had intentions of becoming a Psychiatrist. Which I find incredibly interesting.
- The sicko-Humbert-is convinced he is the power of the universe. He views himself as some form of god. Humbert, the pervert, claims that certain girls: "nymphets" can only be identified by an "artists or a madman". He tells of how men are subject to the "spells" of the "nymphets". According to Humbert: Everything a "nymphet" (a
vulnerable young girl between the ages of nine and fourteen) does can be thought of as solicitation.
- Humbert spent time in a mental hospital playing mind games with shrinks. Who let him go?
- Humbert begins writing down everything Lolita does. He is obsessed. He considers the tying of her shoes to a sex act in disguise.
- Lolita's mother flirts with Humbert even as he obviously preys on her twelve year old daughter. His advances are becoming more and more direct,
blatant, often, and intentioned. I can tell from what I have read thus far that -this mother- is going to make me very angry. Probably as angry as Humbert is making me.
- Lolita is twelve years old and confused out of her mind.
love,
jessieh